Ten percent sample coverage could become a full population review, in less time than the sample used to take.
Built with a Head of Internal Audit in mind
The kind of team this fits: a Middle East retail bank with around 120 branches, an internal audit function of 30 auditors covering 15 business units.
Ten percent coverage isn't a decision anyone made on purpose. It's what's left once thirty auditors spend most of a six week cycle gathering evidence instead of testing it, and the ninety percent that goes unreviewed is simply the part nobody had time to reach.
A photo or illustration of what this looks like today, before any of this runs.
Not a feature list. The actual sequence, from the moment the case lands to the moment someone signs it.
The review moves from a sample to the full population, without adding headcount.
Documentation and control testing evidence assemble automatically as transactions are reviewed.
Findings arrive drafted, with evidence attached, ready for judgment rather than data entry.
Every finding is reviewed and signed by an auditor before it's final.
Screenshot of a Zen Studio canvas configured for a workflow like this one.
An auditor still reviews and signs every finding. Full coverage doesn't mean nobody's looking, it means everybody's covered.
Illustrative, based on the shape of a workflow like this one. The real number depends on the case, the team, and how it's configured.
Screenshot of the Zen Pilot dashboard or explainability panel for a run of this workflow.
For a head of internal audit, a workflow like this starts as a conversation with Zara, describing the process in plain language and getting a first draft of the team back in the same session. Zen Studio is where engineering opens that draft, sets the guardrails node by node, and versions it before it goes live. Zen Pilot is where it actually runs, and where anyone can watch a case move through it in real time, node by node, with the reasoning attached.