30% sample coverage could become full population screening, faster than the sample used to run.
Built with a Head of Compliance in mind
The kind of team this fits: a retail bank onboarding and compliance function, roughly 2,500 new accounts a month.
2,500 new accounts a month, 30% sample coverage, and the honest answer to 'did we screen that account' is sometimes, statistically, no, simply because it wasn't one of the ones pulled that month.
A photo or illustration of what this looks like today, before any of this runs.
Not a feature list. The actual sequence, from the moment the case lands to the moment someone signs it.
Identity, PEP, AML and watchlist checks run on the full population of new accounts.
ID and source documents are checked at intake, not queued for periodic review.
The decision carries the evidence trail that produced it, ready for a regulator to follow.
Screenshot of a Zen Studio canvas configured for a workflow like this one.
A compliance officer still reviews every flagged case. What changes is how many cases never needed a person to notice them in the first place.
Illustrative, based on the shape of a workflow like this one. The real number depends on the case, the team, and how it's configured.
Screenshot of the Zen Pilot dashboard or explainability panel for a run of this workflow.
For a head of compliance, a workflow like this starts as a conversation with Zara, describing the process in plain language and getting a first draft of the team back in the same session. Zen Studio is where engineering opens that draft, sets the guardrails node by node, and versions it before it goes live. Zen Pilot is where it actually runs, and where anyone can watch a case move through it in real time, node by node, with the reasoning attached.