A week-long file could become a same-afternoon accept, decline, or load decision.
Built with a Chief Underwriter in mind
The kind of team this fits: an Indian life insurer, roughly 1,200 applications a month, medical and financial underwriting.
1,200 applications a month, a seven day cycle, and two reviewers looking at the same medical file can land on different accept, decline, or load decisions depending on which mortality table they happened to reach for first.
A photo or illustration of what this looks like today, before any of this runs.
Not a feature list. The actual sequence, from the moment the case lands to the moment someone signs it.
Mortality and moral hazard risk get assessed from the full file, not one document at a time.
Mortality tables and risk factors drive the accept, decline or load recommendation.
SPAR adversarial checks flag underwriting calls that don't match how a similar case was handled, within IRDAI data residency requirements.
Screenshot of a Zen Studio canvas configured for a workflow like this one.
The underwriter still makes the accept, decline or load call. The system's job is to make sure that call is consistent with the last one, not to make it instead.
Illustrative, based on the shape of a workflow like this one. The real number depends on the case, the team, and how it's configured.
Screenshot of the Zen Pilot dashboard or explainability panel for a run of this workflow.
For a chief underwriter, a workflow like this starts as a conversation with Zara, describing the process in plain language and getting a first draft of the team back in the same session. Zen Studio is where engineering opens that draft, sets the guardrails node by node, and versions it before it goes live. Zen Pilot is where it actually runs, and where anyone can watch a case move through it in real time, node by node, with the reasoning attached.